‘ahems and ahahs’

Literature, & Etc.

George R.R. Martin is not your bitch.

with 4 comments

The rights of the author are often overlooked for the sake of the reader. For those unaware George R.R. Martin is the best selling author of A Song of Ice and Fire (Fantasy Series). What Tolkien was to generations past, he is to ours. Ask anyone who reads heavy fantasy of an epic nature and George R.R. Martin’s name will inevitably pop up, along side Steven Erikson, Terry Brooks, & R.A. Salvatore to name a few. A long running argument on various bulletin boards, discussion forums, and coffee houses focuses on what the author owes the reader, specifically George R.R. Martin. Martin has released only 4 of his books in a series that is projected to be at 5 or 6. Martin on average has released each subsequent book in the series at 4 or 5 year intervals. This frustrates many of his fans because Martin keeps an active blog [ Which I urge you to check out. ] Martin actively tours, blogs, writes short stories, etc, and according to certain critics anything short of writing the next book in the series is betrayal, and this is apparently unacceptable. While I often am frustrated by the length of time that each book takes for the next release, I also understand that he’s a fellow human being and has a life on his own. He doesn’t owe the reader anything, it is our privilege to read works that he shares with the world. 

As Erin put it: “What have you written lately?” 

2009-02-03_028_1

Neil Gaiman recently responded to a question on his blog which tackles this issue. Enjoy and try to keep in mind Mr. Gaiman’s advice: “George R.R. Martin is not your bitch.” 

Also, Neil Gaiman is one of the most hilarious and fun twitterers(is that right?) to follow, enjoy and follow him @neilhimself. 

Advertisements

Written by thebeliever07

May 15, 2009 at 10:11 am

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. It’s true. I did say that.

    daughterofben

    May 15, 2009 at 10:21 am

  2. Also, I wonder if this type of ridiculous demand is more unique to series’s books? Readers (I among them) waited seven years for Ondaatje’s latest book, and nine for Michael’s. As far as I know, no one was on their cases about their writing poetry and giving lectures on tour between those books. Most reviewers are claiming Michael’s book (like Ondaatje’s) was well worth the wait. If we have realistic expectations of most non-series novelists, why do we apply different, non-realistic expectations to series writers.

    I’ll happily wait another nine years for Ondaatje, or Michaels, or Gaiman, if I must. They obviously know more about the writing process and the demands of their lives than I do. Also, I’ve got lots of stuff to do.

    daughterofben

    May 15, 2009 at 10:48 am

    • Omit that “‘s” on series.

      daughterofben

      May 15, 2009 at 10:49 am

  3. I often get on Martin’s case, but the writing process is kind of like having your mouth taped shut. You know what you want to say, but it never comes out right. In any case, I’d rather wait for the book and know it’s going to be good, unlike James Patterson who seems to have something coming out monthly and can’t write worth a damn.

    nickoomba

    May 15, 2009 at 12:44 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: